Log in
Tanzania Alliance for Biodiversity

Tanzania Alliance for Biodiversity

Dar es Salaam, Tanzania


                                      MEDIA RELEASE: 4 April 2014


An alliance of 20 civil society organizations and exporters today called for a national debate on GMOs and its regulatory framework so that citizens are well informed before any attempt to weaken biosafety laws is made. Despite assurances that the Biosafety Regulations would stand, it seems yet again Tanzania is bowing to pressure to weaken the legislation protecting Tanzanian consumers against the negative effects of GMOs.


Despite the Government's good intention of putting in place a regulatory regime to govern the utilization of biotechnology, the Biosafety Regulations have been attacked as an obstacle to the development, transfer and use of biotechnology in the country. At the heart of the argument is the principle of strict liability, which holds anyone who introduces GMOs liable for any harm, injury or loss caused by their actions.


A TABIO spokesperson explained: “The strict liability principle has been misunderstood, distorted and misreported to the extent of creating fear on its application as a sound module of liability and redress for harm, injury or loss caused by GMOs. People need to know exactly what the risks are, and how the existing law protects us, in order to make informed choices.”


No scientific consensus on GMO safety. Over 300 international scientists, physicians, academics, and experts strongly reject GM industry claims that there is a scientific consensus on GMO safety and that the debate on this topic is over. "Such claims may place human and environmental health at undue risk and create an atmosphere of complacency," stated Dr. Angelika Hilbeck, chairperson of the European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility (ENSSER)[1].


TABIO cited references[2] to 1400 studies, surveys, and analyses that suggest adverse impacts of genetically engineered crops, foods and related pesticides. They include health impacts, environmental impacts, resistance, pesticide drift, genetic contamination, horizontal gene transfer, unintended effects, as well as references to yields, social impact, ethics, economics and regulations.


GMOs in Dar. Meanwhile imported genetically modified food is on sale in Dar es Salaam supermarkets, and on consumers’ breakfast tables. The Alliance asks if the importers have applied for permission from the regulatory authorities. Citizens are advised to check labels, and be wary of imported maize-based products from countries that have no labeling laws.



Abdallah Mkindi, TABIO Coordinator: tabiosecretariat@gmail.com Tel: 0784 311 179



Notes for Editors

Tanzania is among the very few African countries to date to have developed regulatory regimes to govern the adoption and utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The regulations were put in place to implement the Environment Management Act, which called for the need to have regulations for procedures and processes for the development, handling and use of GMOs. Regulation 56 (1) reads; any person or his agent who imports, transits, make contained or confined use of, release, carries out any activities in relation to GMOs or products thereof or place on the market a GMO shall be strictly liable for any harm, injury or loss caused directly or indirectly by such GMOs or their products or any activity in relation to GMOs.


TABIO position is that the principle of strict liability should neither be weakened nor abandoned in the Biosafety Regulations. It should be maintained to guide the implementation of the Biosafety Regulations so as to provide a balanced approach in utilizing the benefits of modern biotechnology but at the same time protecting human health and the environment from the likely adverse effects that GMOs may pose. Protecting the rights of vulnerable citizens against the profit oriented interests of multinational GM companies whose sole aim is profit maximization at all cost is of paramount importance.


Tanzania Alliance for Biodiversity is an alliance of civil society and private sector organizations concerned with the conservation of agricultural biodiversity for livelihood security and food sovereignty.


The members of the alliance share the aims of conserving biodiversity and supporting sustainable development, promoting farmers’ self-determination and food sovereignty, facilitating exchange of information and experiences concerning sustainable and healthy agriculture policies and practices, ensuring public awareness on issues of concern to the environment, agriculture and biodiversity, and promoting citizen involvement in the decision-making processes which guide the development of biotechnology particularly GMO.


Alliance members believe that Biosafety regulations should be based on the precautionary principle and are convinced that introduction of GM crops or animals is not the right solution to fight poverty and hunger.


Members of the Alliance


  • ActionAid International Tanzania
  • African Biodiversity Network (Kenya)
  • African Centre for Biosafety (South Africa)
  • Biolands
  • BioRe
  • BioSustain
  • Community Water & Environmental Association (COWEA)
  • CVM/APA (Comunità Volontari per il Mondo / AIDS partnership with Africa)
  • Envirocare
  • Sustainable Agriculture Tanzania
  • Swissaid
  • Tanzania Organic Agriculture Movement
  • Tushiriki
  • The Vijiji Foundation



Hans Herren responds to the Washington Post

To the editor of the Washington Post:

In your article Tanzania becomes a battleground in fight over genetically modified crops (October 7th 2013) alternative solutions presented by Africans were blatantly missing in a discussion of the yet to be proven potential benefits of GMOs for African smallholders.

With 27 years experience in Africa as Director General of ICIPE and Director of the Plant Health Division at IITA , I can attest that local R&D has developed and disseminated successful sustainable technologies that have not only increased the yields by 200 to 300 percent (dwarfing the expected 25 percent) - as proven in the case of maize using the Push-Pull, or SRI for rice technologies in Eastern Africa, or permanently controlled pest such as the cassava mealybug with natural methods across the continent - but also continuously adapted them to new local challenges, including climate change. Public agricultural research continues to be stifled by low funding. This is especially dramatic in Tanzania, where funding is so low that there is little hope of any impact on rural development and poverty reduction (ASTI IFPRI Report 2012). Given that "80 percent of the people live by subsistence agriculture", this assessment is damning. Combined with the proven high cost-benefit ratios of public agricultural investments, effective solutions need to build upon and strengthen farmers' local knowledge and capabilities. GM crops fail to do that: a common fallacy when drawing from the apparent success in the US to African smallholders. It is in this context that combining indigenous seeds - or even including currently field-tested non-GM varieties from CIMMYT (http://dtma.cimmyt.org/) - with increased diversification, organic manure and sustainable crop management represent proven knowledge- and labor-intensive strategies that can reach the poorest of farmers with lasting social, environmnetal and economic benefits. Attempting to move above the fray of the US and EU battles and polemics, we would be well advised to strengthen support for African solutions, and respect their sovereignty in decision-making.

Hans R. Herren
Right Livelihood Award Laureate 2013, World Food Prize Laureate 1995
President of Biovision Foundation and the Millennium Institute

Tanzania: Government to Endorse GM Maize Trials Soon?


 LOCAL seeds experts are optimistic about government move to allow field trials of genetically engineered maize which has already proved successful in confined laboratory trials at Makutupora in Dodoma region.

Mikocheni Agriculture Research Institute (MARI) Principal Research Officer, Dr Alois Kullaya told the 'Sunday News' during the week that although it has taken many years to change regulations barring field trials of GM maize, progress is being made to that effect. He hoped that implementation of the plan may come true before end of this year.

"I hope a decision will be made soon, probably this year, I am very optimistic," said Dr Kullaya. MARI has undertaken confined laboratory trials for GM maize in a pilot project which ended in 2009 but strict regulations have stopped field trials of the same.

According to the country's Biosafety Regulations of 2009 set out, it applies a strict liability principle which essentially holds anyone associated with importing, transporting, selling or using a GM product liable for any perceived harm associated with it.

Scientists argue that the "guilty until proven innocent" approach is detrimental to the technology which is already being used by over 17 million farmers globally.

Dr Kullaya warned that while other east African countries like Kenya and Uganda have adopted a different, fault-based regulatory approach where harm and negligence must be proved, Tanzania risks losing out as commercial approved in the two countries will have a negative impact in the country.

"Kenya and Uganda are doing field trials and soon they will authorize commercial production which will also affect us as we cannot stop GM crops from crossing our border," Dr Kullaya who is also Coordinator for Water Efficient Maize for Africa (WEMA) initiative noted.

But anti-GMO activists are pressing the government to stay the course and ensure that the country remains a GM free territory for fear of the unknown.

Tanzania Alliance for Biodiversity Coordinator, Abdallah Mkinde said, "The stringent law should continue to exist so that whoever introduces GM crops should be responsible for whatever happens on the ground." He said TAB and its 18 member non-governmental organizations is doing a sensitization campaign to the public to warn farmers and consumers about the dangers of growing and eating genetically engineered organism.

TAB is planning a major sensitization meeting with lawmakers to inform them of the negative effects of GM technology and prepare them to shoot down any government bill seeking to amend the 2004 National Environmental Management Act.

The TAB Coordinator said recent research by French scientists which has linked GM foods with cancer is a wakeup call to the government to maintain its strict position on the crops which are also linked with negative impact on the environment.

But with the country facing a rapidly increasing population and climate change affecting food production, the decision to allow drought and disease resistant maize and other staples looks imminent.

Minister for Agriculture, Food Security and Cooperatives, Engineer Christopher Chiza has already announced that five regions are facing food shortages because of inadequate rains and disease attacks on maize and bananas.


Tanzanian CSOs say No to UPOV in Africa.

African civil society organisations concerned about AGRA